A hearing batch of cross petitions challenging a 2010 Allahabad High Court verdict on the Ayodhya title suit, Supreme Court on wednesday announced that, even after a barbaric act a mosque will remain a place of worship even after it has been desecrated and destroyed.
The senior counsel Rajeev Dhavan told the bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra Justice Ashok Bhusan and Justice S. Abdul Nazeer that, “A mosque will remain a place of worship even after it has been destroyed.”
Dhavan also said that, “It is quite a different matter to say that an area has been acquired and quite another to say mosque is not a mosque forever.” Dhavan being the main petitioner, Mohhamad Siddiqui now being represented by legal heirs.
The bench is hearing arguments on the plea to revisit 1994 top court judgment which had said that the mosque was not was not an essential part of Islamic religious practice and that namaz could be offered anywhere, even in open places.
Dhavan by describing December 6, 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid as a “barbaric act” said, “What was desecrated was a mosque and what court is being asked to is to protect the idols (of Ram Lalla).” Dhavan also told to the government that they can acquire the place of worship but added, “It is abundantly clear that a mosque should be treated as equal any temple” and “Ramjanmabhoomi is equal to mosque”. Referring to “two powerful Rath Yatras” led by senior BJP leader L.K. Advani, Dhavan told the bench that “there was strident, calculated and deliberate attempt to destroy Babri Masjid”.
Senior counsel K. Parasaran, appearing on the other side, said that the 1994 top court observation that a mosque was not an essential part of Islamic religious practice and namaz could be offered anywhere was in the context of acquisition proceedings. The bench at this said that if it decides to revisit the 1994 judgment, then it would be on the principle whether mosque was an integral part of Islamic religious practice.
March 14th, the last hearing of the matter, Dhavan had told the court that if the positrion in the 1994 judgement was to accepted then except for Makkah, Madinah and Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, rest of the mosques will be of no consequence to Muslims. On the next hearing on April 5, Dhavan will address the court on what mosque means to Islam.